The backwards economic model of news agencies

Cory Doctorow has a very interesting piece up today.

Why do newspapers charge for yesterday’s news?

The problem with the NYT’s system is that it ensures that the Times can’t be the paper of record any longer, because even if a thousand bloggers point to a great article on the day it comes out, thirty days later it will be invisible to the 99.999 percent of the Web who won’t pay for access to fishwrap, no matter how interesting.

Doctorow proposes that newspapers offer their archives for free and charge for today’s news.

It’s a great idea. The only way it’s going to happen, though, is either for one agency to do it first and show great success, or for many agencies to all agree to do it at once. I can easily see them all having cold feet about completely reversing their model.

They shouldn’t, though. The web is moving to a pay-per-service model, I believe. People are more than willing to pay for things they enjoy, such as webcomics.

The one big ethical dilemma I see here is that news is a very different commodity from entertainment. For all intents and purposes, people need to read the news. How, then, can we justify charging for it?

Of course, to that question there is always the answer: Well, we charge people for food, don’t we?

Published
Categorized as general

The loss of innocence

The other day, Sean and I finished watching Aishiteruze Baby. The title roughly translates to “Love Ya Baby”, with “baby” taking on a double meaning–the suffix –ze is a boastful masculine form of speech, so we would expect that “baby” would refer to the speaker’s girlfriend, but it actually refers to a little girl the speaker is caring for. (I assume here, of course, that the main character, Katakura Kippei, is the “speaker”. It fits: when the anime begins, he is a total womanizer.)

On the surface, this seems to be an innocent, carefree, heartwarming story, but then things begin to happen.

The premise is that the little girl, Yuzuyu, is dropped into the Katakura family’s lap by her mother, who has stated that she is unable to take care of her. Kippei, a high school student, becomes her primary caregiver. While we are left wondering about a mother who would abandon her child, we get clues–brief flashbacks of the mother being unable to deal with Yuzu, and the father having to balance them both. We learn that the father has died, and this leaves the mother unable to function. While that explains the abandonment to a point, we get a further piece of information about halfway through the series.

Yuzu’s mother, Miyako, shows up at Yuzu’s school, watching her from afar, not showing herself. Kippei discovers her and confronts her about why she left her child. Miyako breaks down and tells him that she once struck Yuzu. Kippei is nonplussed, remarking that he’d been beaten up by his mother and sister all his life, and he was fine. But Miyako whispers, “Chigau. Sou ja nai. Kodomo ga warui ja nai” (or something to that effect; translation: “No. That’s not it. She’d done nothing wrong”).

After this point, the series takes on an extremely dark edge. We meet new characters: a boy Yuzu’s age who is physically and emotionally abused by his mother, and a girl a little younger than Kippei who was bullied so badly at school that she’d taken to burning herself all up her arm to prove that she was strong.

The little boy had to fall down a flight of stairs before his mother came to her senses. I have to tell you, I was furious during this part of the anime. While Kippei’s older sister and the kindergarten teachers tried to save the boy from his mother, the boy would always stubbornly say that his mother hadn’t hurt him and that he wanted to stay with her. Children want their mothers, Kippei reflected, and took it upon himself to speak to the woman. But she only took his words to heart after she moved to strike her child and he stumbled and fell down the stairs.

Every scene with the mother was filled with her internal thoughts. “Chigau. Sou ja nai. Kodomo ga warui ja nai,” in an echo of what Yuzuyu’s mother had said. And then she asked herself desperately, “When did I become like this?” I had absolutely no patience for it.

You see, the woman was abusive because she was insecure. Her husband had lost his job. All the woman could think about was how her status fell in the eyes of the other mothers in the neighborhood. Everything she did was an effort to hide her “shame”. So, of course, she had little time for a beautiful, outgoing, funny child who drew attention to himself by acting out. No matter how much she scolded him and struck him, he kept “misbehaving”, so obviously she just had to hit him more.

I hate that character. I hate that she used her position, the position of mother, giver of life, to abuse the greatest gift she had ever received. When things were finally resolved, when she agreed to doctor-advised counseling and the family decided to move so that the husband could find a job, I was still unhappy.

But her son was joyous, and he told Yuzu as he was about to leave that his mother was “a lot nicer now”.

Motherhood is a position of power. I have no sympathy for those who refuse to acknowledge that fact, who turn to excuses to explain their renunciation of responsibility.

The other new character, the girl who was bullied at school, was also being physically abused, this time by her father. She refused to tell her parents what was going on at school, so her parents only knew that she was acting out, dyeing her hair, and being smart to them. She felt more and more alone as the series progressed, and eventually tried to kill herself. Kippei was able to talk her down, though, and a tenuous understanding was finally reached with her parents.

What makes this series truly shocking is that Yuzuyu is the witness to it all. She saw her friend’s mother hit him. She saw the girl try to kill herself. And while she seemed to keep her childish innocence, you could tell that a new kind of wisdom was growing beneath it.

Yuzu was growing up, was forced to grow up by the cruel circumstances of her own and other people’s lives.

Today, when I saw this headline on Mainichi, all I could think of was Aishiteruze Baby and the truths it had taught me.

Young couple starve ‘burdensome’ 3-year-old daughter to death

The world can be a beautiful place. But it is also ugly.

Published
Categorized as general

Totally fucked up

So here’s a guy who has a family with his ex-wife. He lives at the home with them for part of the time. But he also has a family with his girlfriend, and he lives with them part-time too. He owns both houses, and supports both families financially.

Now, a third woman is suing him for more child support for the child they have together.

Sheesh, let’s just ship this guy to Utah!

Published
Categorized as general

Snopes’ take on the viral Volkwagen ad

Further cementing its position as an opinion site, Snopes makes the following pronouncement in its article concerning the absolutely hilarious “Small but tough.” ad:

Companies often try to obscure the connections between themselves and their viral ads, sometimes claiming that promotions were “unauthorized” or “accidentally released.” Though this technique may be effective in generating publicity, it can also backfire: If someone does indeed produce an unauthorized viral ad that creates negative publicity for the business it supposedly promotes, how can a company prove they weren’t behind it? This is the dilemma currently faced by Volkswagen regarding a viral ad seemingly calculated to offend as many human beings as possible.

I haven’t seen too many people offended by this…Miss Em notes,

i think it’s very clever – of course, we all want car bombers to be thwarted in some way (well, most people do, anyway) and it also shows how strong the car is….. but does it make people associate that car with car bombers?

While I’m not particularly concerned about people associating the car with suicide bombers (if you take the ad literally, the bomber would have to be stupid to actually use the car), it did occur to me that a suicide bomber might choose to use one in the future because we’d never expect it. But that, really, is the only (extraordinarily minor) concern I can admit to having on the subject. I certainly was not “offended”. So I suppose the next question to ask is this: is Volkswagen currently suffering due to this “negative publicity”? Or was that simply another Snopes opinion?

Published
Categorized as general

Prince of Tennis is real!

Wakato's Hewitt impression

“COME ON!!!”

In episode 80, Wakato does his Change Over into a person I’d never heard of before, Lleyton Hewitt. But he’s real!!!!!!

…yes, I am a dork.

(Thanks to Hai for pointing me to the episode. Does that make him a bigger dork?)

Published
Categorized as general

"I think I’m gonna have a heart attack and die from not surprise."

That quote’s from Aladdin. But it fits my results on this quiz, doesn’t it?

“WHAT RELIGION BESTS SUITS YOU?”
bluhdoy

Agnostic
You’ve probably studied loads of different religions, but you’re just not sure if any of it is true. Evolution makes some sense to you, but it doesn’t satisfy you. Lastly, your personality is one of question, but you won’t go out of your way to find -The Truth- It’s more of a hobby.
Published
Categorized as general

"This is one way to at least get their attention."

It could be a futile gesture, but Richmond is looking at banning the transport of chemical weapons by plane, train, or truck.

Such ordinances would seem to pose a problem if the Pentagon decides to send the 523 tons of decaying chemical weapons from Blue Grass Army Depot near Richmond to an incineration site, such as the one in Anniston, Ala.

It’s probably not possible to ship a trainload or truckload of the nerve agents VX or GB out of the depot without going through Richmond, which lies between the depot and Interstate 75. The ordinance, which presumably would be enforced by city police, would subject violators to fines up to $5,000.

I don’t know that a mere $5,000 will deter government officials, but then again they are considering moving the nerve agents (previously mentioned here) because of budget restrictions. You never know.

Richmond City Manager David Evans sees the ordinance as more than a symbolic statement.

“If it passes the commission, it would be a strong indication of the feelings of the city, and hopefully that would not be ignored,” he said.

Indeed! It’s dangerous to move them, and destroying them near Richmond would add needed jobs to the area. If the budget is so constrained, maybe there’s a way to privatize.

After what happened in Graniteville, does the government really want to risk moving these weapons?

Published
Categorized as general

A complete non-issue

Norwegians [and liberal Americans] Confused [and delighted] by Bush Salute

Bush, a former Texas governor, was simply greeting the Texas Longhorn marching band as it passed during a Washington D.C. parade in the president’s honor, explained Verdens Gang, Norway’s largest newspaper.

Just the same, the Internet was abuzz Thursday with speculation about what the Bushes really mean by the sign.

Yes, it was. I guess. I only saw BoingBoing’s breathless “OMG Bush <3 Satan” post updated three or four times, after all. (Someone was so excited at the prospect that he even made T-shirts.)

Published
Categorized as general

Separate but not unequal?

Intelligence in men and women is a gray and white matter: Men and women use different brain areas to achieve similar IQ results, UCI study finds

I remember, back when I was in high school, having a furious debate with Michael Jennings via email over the differences between men and women–I was arguing that they were different yet equal overall, and he was arguing that “separate is inherently unequal”, citing Brown v. Board. I did not consider a comparison of the sexes to be analogous to a comparison of races, especially since the “separate” mentioned in this case refers to the quality of education, not to the actual people involved. To wit: “We conclude that in the field of public education, the doctrine of separate but equal has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” I also was unimpressed with the notion of allowing court cases to dictate one’s personal ethics. Unfortunately, I wasn’t very eloquent back then, so I think I ultimately lost that debate.

After all these years, though, it looks like I get the last laugh!

Ahahaha!

;P

(Side note: I don’t know what Michael would say about that debate now. This was, like, nine years ago, or something. Hell, I could have even misinterpreted what he was trying to say…but the debate/argument had a profound effect on my opinions, so I cite it as I remember it.)

Published
Categorized as general

Just caught up (finally) on Naruto manga

O_O

holy...

Way too many cool things happened…Naruto vs. Sasuke, Sakura finally on the road to becoming useful (yeesh), and then Kakashi’s backstory…when it said “Uchiha Obito” I gasped aloud, “It’s his eye!!”

Damn!

I am a total Narutard. And I’m unrepentant!

Published
Categorized as general